change has come to america
"If you don't stick to your values when they're being tested, they're not values. They're hobbies!"
"If you don't stick to your values when they're being tested, they're not values. They're hobbies!"
Posted by
abf
at
8:33 PM
1 comments
Labels: barack obama, politics, television
It feels a bit like cheating to write an end of year blog post when I haven't been posting much, but I'm a sucker for tradition and a touch obsessive compulsive, so it's going to happen. And, well, I'm resolved to get this blog going again in 2009, so consider this a new beginning.
Anyway, this is my, I believe, fourth end of year post. I generally wait for Kristen to tag me, but she's pretty much abandoned her blog as well, so I'm not sure I can wait that long.
Here we go.
What did you do in 2008 that you had never done before?



Posted by
abf
at
1:30 PM
11
comments
Labels: barack obama, blog business, books, family, friends, hillary clinton, movies, politics, rock stars, television, travels, wonder of me
Barack Obama, since winning the Presidential election, has indicated that social media will be a part of his presidency, just as it was a part of his presidential campaign.
In the 18 days since he was elected, he has launched Change.gov, the Web site of "the Office of the President-Elect" and has done two weekly addresses via YouTube on the ChangeDotGov channel.
So, how is he doing?
Change.gov/Grade = B -
The most impressive part of Change.gov is the speed with which it was launched, just two days after the election, on November 6. But what about the content?
Positive:
1) It has a blog that is updated almost daily and often multiple times per day, meaning the site is giving a reason to users to keep coming back. (You can sign up for an RSS feed for the blog.)
2) The blog posts incorporate video from the ChangeDotGov YouTube channel, as well as photos, making it (albeit slightly) more visually compelling.
Negative:
1) The blog does not accept comments which, as far as I am concerned, means that it's NOT a blog and is instead simply a series of press releases written in more conversational tone and listed in reverse chronological order. Boo.
2) While the site encourages visitors to submit their comments on agenda issues , these comments are not able to be seen by other visitors to the site. In fact, it's unclear what will become of the comments. What then, is the motivation to submit? Peter Kim recently wrote on his blog that the incentive for social media participation is the "activation of the feedback channel - that others agree, disagree, share, favorite their content." What is the incentive when the content seemingly falls into the abyss, never to be heard from again?
3) This same sense of an "abyss" applies to the site's "An American Moment: Your Story" feature. What are they going to do with this content?
ChangeDotGov YouTube Channel/Grade = B-
Barack Obama is alternately being compared to Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Delano Roosevelt — pretty good company to keep. The FDR comparison was only heightened with the launch of Obama's "Weekly Address from the President-Elect," which is being compared with the former President's Fireside Chats, which were used to provide comfort and motivation to the country in the midst of the Great Depression.
Positive:
1) Posting content to YouTube encourages its viral spread, particularly because of the feature which allows users to cut and paste code to embed it on their blogs, social network profiles, etc.
2) The "Inside the Transition" videos from transition team members, particularly the video from Heather Zichal, a member of Obama's Energy and Environment Policy Team, are great. Heather responds directly to comments that have come in on Change.gov (so, THAT's how they're being used), helping to communicate that the new administration really just might be listening.
Negative:
1) Both comments and ratings have been disabled. Is someone afraid of a little honest feedback?
2) Barack Obama is a great speaker. There's no doubt about it. But his style in these Weekly Addresses is all wrong for the medium. I know, I know, he's President-Elect and he needs to present himself as "presidential." But we already let him know that we think he's presidential by electing him to the Office. Now we're counting on him to change what that means. Obama? Yeah. Relax a little and come out from behind the desk. Give us a reason to want to share them with our friends — our friends who don't suffer from insomnia.
Do you agree that Obama could be doing better with his social media efforts?
Posted by
abf
at
10:55 PM
1 comments
Labels: barack obama, politics, social media
Barack Obama is being called our "first social media President" due to his use of online word of mouth marketing to be elected President of the United States. Those of us who have been proselytizing about social media to our clients and colleagues simultaneously feel an inevitable sense of validation and a tinge of fear (and frustration) as clients feel inclined to ask, "Why can't we do what Obama did?"
(Folks, Obama's marketing campaign cost $640 million and had the key ingredient of any successful word of mouth marketing campaign: a really excellent "product" with a great story to tell.)
But now what? How can he continue to engage with social media successfully once he is in the White House — and should he?
Four Reasons Why Barack Obama Should Continue to Engage with Social Media
Number One: The 2012 Election is Already Underway
The 2012 Presidential election started on November 5, maybe even the moment that Barack Obama took the stage with his family in Grant Park. He is going to need money and the same grassroots infrastructure to get reelected and there's no time like the present to get started.
Number Two: Young Voters
Young voters have disproportionately voted for Democratic candidates in the past two presidential elections and the Republican Party, as it focuses on rebuilding itself following its huge losses in this year's election, is likely to be investing in strategies to engage young people and sell them on the Republican brand. To retain their support, Obama, with millions of young people already in his camp, must rely on young voters to engage their peers — and younger siblings and friends — as word of mouth ambassadors by reaching out within their social networks on his behalf.
Number Three: His Network Makes Him Stronger
November 5 was not only the start of the 2012 election for President, it was the start of the 2010 congressional election. Obama's former colleagues in the Senate and House would love to have the support (financial and grassroots) of Obama's network. Knowing that it remains intact — and, perhaps, is growing in size and strength — gives Obama a powerful bargaining tool and people to call on and mobilize when he needs a helping hand to see his policies through.
Number Four: He Has Created Expectations that He Needs to Live Up To
When I talk to people about social media, I explain to them that I think social media has contributed to and is reflective of a change in the relationship between consumers and the brands with which they do business. Consumers have expectations that brands need to live up to to be successful:
1) consumers want brands to listen to them,
2) they want brands to be honest and transparent, and
3) they want brands to provide them with the opportunity to help them achieve their missions.
Obama, as a brand, lived up to each of these expectations, in part through the use of social media. If he turns his back on them now, by demonstrating that he is no longer willing to listen, to let them in, and to involve them in creating "the change we want to see," he will lose them and he will have demonstrated that "change" was nothing more than a campaign slogan.
Do you have any reasons to add to the list — or do you think Obama should shut down his Twitter account now that he's heading to the Oval Office?
It looks like he has already made that decision . . .
Posted by
abf
at
9:33 PM
1 comments
Labels: barack obama, politics, social media
Posted by
abf
at
12:27 AM
1 comments
Labels: barack obama, politics
Posted by
abf
at
1:52 PM
0
comments
Labels: barack obama, politics
Barack Obama comes back swinging in response to the McCain's accusations of Obama as a celebrity, along the lines of Paris Hilton and Britney Spears.
Here's the original ad from McCain.
And, what the hell, here's the response from Paris Hilton, probably the best of all.
Posted by
abf
at
7:14 AM
0
comments
Labels: barack obama, politics
GeekLove asked me to post her videos about Hillary after reading my post about Marie Cicco's piece in the Post.
They're a little long, but they are, nevertheless, inspiring and should remind us all (yes, including Hillary) that the revolution that is the 2008 election should not be remembered as an election in which we allowed the media to pit a black man against a white woman and, in the process, let an old, white, millionaire man win.
Posted by
abf
at
11:43 AM
0
comments
Labels: barack obama, hillary clinton, politics
Posted by
abf
at
12:18 PM
0
comments
Labels: barack obama, politics, video, youtube
Rob Garner from iCrossing posts on Media Post's Search Insider about their recent findings about how voters are using search. According to the research:
Posted by
abf
at
10:45 AM
0
comments
Labels: barack obama, politics, search
There's an editorial from Catherine Rampell in Sunday's Washington Post that says the efforts of nonpartisan youth voter engagement groups like Rock the Vote and Declare Yourself have, year after year, been a failure and that "the junior Senator from Illinois" (aka Barack Obama) has been the force we have all been waiting for to get young people to the polls.
No f*cking kidding -- except that I think there's more to it. Something had to happen to make it clear that it was worth it for the Obama team to try to engage those young voters.
Back in 2000, I was at the helm of one of those organizations: Rock the Vote (so, yes, I was feeling a bit defensive when I read the editorial). We did, as Rampell writes, try to increase the number of young people who turned out to vote by eliminating barriers to their participation and by suggesting that voting was a "subversive" activity ("Piss of a Politician. Vote." was one of the t-shirts our street teams were wearing that year). But we were also doing something else that Rampell neglects to acknowledge: we were trying to convince politicians and their campaign advisers to invest money in youth voter outreach and to speak to young voters by directly addressing issues that were relevant to their lives.
The Youth Vote Coalition -- which included leadership from Rock the Vote, the League of Women Voters, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, U.S. PIRG and the National Council of La Raza -- literally called on the candidates for the White House to dedicate a debate to address young voters (back in the day when there wasn't a debate every fifteen minutes). The idea was sh*t on by the Commission on Presidential Debates when their leadership dismissed our proposal with the response, "We can't dedicate a debate to every group that wants one. Left-handed flute players want their own debate."
(Literally. Left. Handed. Flute. Players.)
We KNEW that our organization's paltry budgets could not compare to the hundreds of millions of dollars that candidates were investing in reaching older, more reliable voters. We KNEW that, to create true, meaningful change and to get young people to vote, we were going to need to demonstrate to campaign advisers that it was worth it, that the cost of the youth vote wasn't too high for them to invest in. We KNEW that the "cycle of neglect" (young people ignoring the political process because the political process ignored them) would only be broken if a candidate stepped up to the plate and said to young people, "I want your vote." In the meantime, we made t-shirts and ads and we appeared on CNN and in the newspapers to remind the powers that be that young people were checking out and that a generational dismissal of the democratic process wasn't democracy at all.
Yes, Senator Obama has done a tremendous amount to bring young people out to the polls (which is due, in some part, to the tireless efforts of his director of youth voter outreach, a former Rock the Vote staffer, Hans Riemer). But, as I said up front, I think there's more to it. Other forces are in play that have made it possible for Obama to do what we were begging other candidates to do eight years ago.
Campaign strategists think about the cost per vote. Literally. How much does the campaign have to spend to get you to show up at polls and pull the lever in your favor? When the most effective media was television, it wasn't a good deal. Paying for ad time on shows that targeted 18-24 year olds was expensive and the ROI was low.
But today? The 2004 election -- which saw a increase in youth voter turnout -- demonstrated that young people were, post-9/11 and in the midst of the Iraq war, more confident that the question of who was sitting in the White House had some relevance to their lives. And they were voting Democrat.
In 2008, this bump in youth participation, coupled with the exponential decrease in the cost of reaching young voters because of the reach and engagement of social media, is what I think gave the Obama team the rationalization they needed to truly invest in young people, the incentive to break the cycle of neglect.
And then Obama brought the rest. But "the rest" that he brought would not, I believe, have been accomplished without social media. That sense of a national movement with unstoppable momentum? The over-capacity crowds at every stop? That's not television ads and direct mail, my friends. That's social networks. That's text messaging.
1) Young people needed to step up to do their part to break the cycle of neglect.
They did.
2) The cost of reaching young voters needed to decrease.
It did.
3) A candidate -- and his campaign -- needed to see the new ROI of investing in the youth vote.
He did.
And then he trusted this new media to not only reach young voters, but to engage them as well and to enable them to become evangelists for the cause.
Serendipity, folks. The cycle of neglect has been broken.
Posted by
abf
at
9:31 AM
2
comments
Labels: barack obama, politics, wonder of me, youth
Word of Mouth
Robbin at Brains on Fire can't figure out why folks in the C-suite are so freaked out about "loud and proud customers taking co-ownership of (their) success." As she says, "It requires letting go of control," something that the Barack Obama campaign, she points out (as well as Ron Paul, I point out) have been willing to do, to their benefit. In this election cycle, voter generated contact has increased the profile of candidates with minimal name recognition and have helped to turn out record numbers of voters at the polls. "Why," Robbin asks, "should a company care if its customers create art with your product or express their love in a song?"
Digital Advocacy
Katya at Katya's Non-Profit Marketing Blog has a list of 15 reasons why people make donations to organizations. Note, she says, that "'Because I loved the organization's brochure,' is not on there." What is? Word of mouth, great storytelling, a belief that they can have an impact, tax deductions, personal values, it's the cool/right thing to do. Check out the full list and consider adding a few of your own.
Fan Brands
Dave Armano is such a rock star. I would love to be able to think in terms of visuals and tell such simple yet fascinating stories through infographics in the way he does. This time it's the "Novelty Curve": the path from "I can't live without this" to "what was I thinking?"
Posted by
abf
at
8:18 PM
2
comments
Labels: barack obama, cocreation, cool stuff, digital advocacy, marketing, politics, word of mouth
Pete Blackshaw, blogger, Ohio resident and new daddy, has spent some time looking at the interactive strategies of the Democratic presidential candidates and is impressed.
He's posted the the 10 Interactive Marketing Tips from Barack and Hillary on ClickZ and here is some of my favorite stuff from the list:

Thanks, Pete.
Posted by
abf
at
7:01 PM
0
comments
Labels: barack obama, digital advocacy, hillary clinton, politics
In a post on TechPresident, Isaac Garcia has a great analysis about how Senator Obama's campaign is an illustration of how the Long Tail theory is coming to life in politics. Essentially, just as technology has provided the opportunity for marketers to reach the most narrow niches of consumers, it has also enabled candidates to tailor their messages and engage those who may have felt left out of the process in the past - as donors, as ambassadors and as voters.
The Kaiser Family Foundation's health08.org has pulled together an "issue spotlight" on global health and HIV/AIDS, providing an analysis of Clinton, Huckabee, McCain and Obama's positions on what they will do as President to wipe out poverty-related disease in the developing world. You may have made your decision or cast your vote already, but if this issue matters to you as much as it does to me, we still need to be prepared to hold the new administration accountable to their promises when the dust finally settles.
Update: Matthew Kavanaugh is asking a valid question at The Huffington Post about the current crop of candidates' commitment to the global HIV/AIDS pandemic. In the midst of reauthorization of the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), where are their voices?
Posted by
abf
at
10:54 PM
0
comments
Labels: AIDS, barack obama, digital advocacy, digital influence, health, politics
Who had the power to remove the video that illustrated Senator Barack Obama's supposed plagiarism of a speech made by Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick?
According to YouTube, "This video has been removed due to terms of use violation."
Posted by
abf
at
10:38 PM
0
comments
Labels: barack obama, politics